Case Study

Example Scenario: Richmond Residential Development

An illustrative example of how development finance could be structured for a residential conversion project in Richmond upon Thames — not a completed transaction.

By Construction Capital•15 February 2026

This is an illustrative example scenario, not a completed transaction, showing how Construction Capital would typically structure development finance for a residential conversion project in Richmond upon Thames, where average property values are £750 per square foot.

The Project

In this scenario, a developer with three completed projects approaches us to fund a high-specification residential conversion of a period building in Richmond.

Key Numbers

| Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Location | Richmond upon Thames | | Project Type | Luxury Residential Conversion | | GDV | £6,000K | | Build Period | 18 months | | Local Rental Yield | 3.4% | | Planning Approval Rate | 66% |

The Challenge

In this scenario, the developer needs to move quickly — the vendor has set a 6-week exchange deadline. Traditional bank funding would take 8-12 weeks, risking the loss of the site. Additionally, the developer wants to maximise leverage to preserve capital for a second project in the pipeline.

Our Solution

We would structure a combined senior debt and mezzanine facility:

  • Senior debt: 60% of GDV at 7.5% per annum, providing the primary development funding with staged drawdowns
  • Mezzanine finance: Top-up funding taking total leverage to 85% of costs, secured by second charge
  • Total developer equity: Reduced to just 15% of total project costs
  • The key is finding a senior lender comfortable with Richmond's heritage-heavy market, where conservation areas cover 52% of the borough. Richmond's 66% planning approval rate and 15 active development sites give lenders confidence in the local market.

    The Timeline

  • Week 1: Initial enquiry received, site visited, indicative terms issued within 48 hours
  • Week 2-3: RICS valuation instructed, planning consultant engaged, QS cost plan reviewed
  • Week 4: Formal offers issued by both senior and mezzanine lenders
  • Week 5-6: Legal completion and first drawdown — meeting the vendor's deadline
  • The Outcome

    In this illustrative scenario, the project completes on time and within budget at 18 months, with units sold within 3 months of practical completion at or above the projected GDV, and a return on equity in the region of 25%, reflecting the leverage structure typically achievable with this facility mix.

    Lessons for Richmond Developers

    1. Speed matters — Having a broker with established lender relationships cuts weeks off the process 2. Leverage enhances returns — Combining senior and mezzanine finance can significantly improve a developer's ROE 3. Local knowledge counts — Understanding Richmond's planning environment and market values helps secure competitive terms 4. Exit strategy flexibility — With around 3.4% rental yields in Richmond, developers have the option to sell or hold

    Discuss your Richmond project with us — indicative terms within 24 hours.

    This is an illustrative example scenario for guidance only, not a completed transaction or a real, identifiable client. Rates and terms are indicative and subject to change. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid Data 2025, Richmond Council Planning Committee Reports 2024/25.

    Ready to Fund Your Next Project?

    Speak with our specialist team about your development finance requirements across London.